ReproducibiliTea Journal Club to discuss reproducibility in systematic reviews
Welcome to the February 26th meeting of the Lund Biomedicine ReproducibiliTea journal club!
In this meeting, we will discuss Holly Else’s article, “‘Systematic reviews’ that aim to extract broad conclusions from many studies are in peril,” which examines how the quality—or lack thereof—of published articles impacts the reliability of systematic reviews.
Whether you are interested in improving research practices or learning more about the challenges facing systematic reviews, this session will provide an opportunity for thoughtful discussion. We look forward to seeing you there!
Make sure to save the date for our other meetings:
- March 19: Topic TBD
- April 23: Topic TBD
- May 21: Topic TBD
- June 18: Topic TBD
Keep an eye on the Lund Biomedicine registration page for the latest updates.
About ReproducibiliTea:
ReproducibiliTea is a grassroots journal club initiative that supports researchers in establishing local Open Science journal clubs at their universities, fostering discussions on a wide range of topics, papers, and ideas related to improving science, reproducibility, and the Open Science movement. Launched in early 2018 at the University of Oxford, ReproducibiliTea has since expanded to 116 institutions across 28 countries.
About AdvanSci Research Solutions:
AdvanSci is dedicated to transforming innovative ideas into reproducible and impactful science. Supporting life science companies and academic groups at every stage of the research process, AdvanSci’s expertise spans basic, translational, and clinical research across a wide range of biomedical fields. From study design and data analysis to regulatory writing and publication support, AdvanSci provides comprehensive services to ensure high-quality, reliable outcomes that drive scientific progress.